Rating:
(1 reviews)
Author: FREE Shipping See details FastShip-CustomerFocus Fulfilled by Amazon Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering
ISBN : 0387098240
New from $113.09
Format: PDF
You can download Free Identifying Malicious Code Through Reverse Engineering (Advances in Information Security) [Hardcover] from 4shared, mediafire, hotfile, and mirror link
Attacks take place everyday with computers connected to the internet, because of worms, viruses or due to vulnerable software. These attacks result in a loss of millions of dollars to businesses across the world.
Identifying Malicious Code through Reverse Engineering provides information on reverse engineering and concepts that can be used to identify the malicious patterns in vulnerable software. The malicious patterns are used to develop signatures to prevent vulnerability and block worms or viruses. This book also includes the latest exploits through various case studies.
Identifying Malicious Code through Reverse Engineering is designed for professionals composed of practitioners and researchers writing signatures to prevent virus and software vulnerabilities. This book is also suitable for advanced-level students in computer science and engineering studying information security, as a secondary textbook or reference.
Direct download links available for Free Identifying Malicious Code Through Reverse Engineering
- Series: Advances in Information Security (Book 44)
- Hardcover: 188 pages
- Publisher: Springer; 2009 edition (April 22, 2009)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 0387098240
- ISBN-13: 978-0387098241
- Product Dimensions: 0.7 x 6.3 x 9.2 inches
- Shipping Weight: 1 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
Free Identifying Malicious Code Through Reverse Engineering
Bad English, bad grammar, bad editing.
No one has done a proofreading before publishing this book. The book is FULL with mistakes and errors in English, grammar, typos, inconsistency in names and descriptions. Some times the mistakes lead to plain wrong statements. A dilettante editing of a book that could have been written much better. Disappointment!
By Avishai Brandeis